The company’s management claims that it gives customers an optimised and quality trading service. RevenueAR’s primary focus is on Contracts for Difference (CFDs). Customer feedback is generally mostly negative and always accuses the company of malpractice. We set out to determine whether the dealer is a scam or just a poorly conceptualised project.
About Our Team
RevenueAR Snapshot
| Claimed Regulation | CSSF Luxembourg |
| Verified Regulation | Not Found |
| Licence Last Checked | 08/05/2025 |
| Minimum Deposit | $500 |
| Retail Leverage up To | 1:50 |
| Affiliate Programme | No details |
| Type of Education | Not Found |
| Claimed Year Foundation | Unknown |
| Domain Parked Since | 28/05/2024 |
| Trading Software | TradingView |
| Mobile Compatibility | Browser Trading |
| Languages Supported | En |
Advantages and Disadvantages
-
The site provides access to legal papers such as the “User Agreement” and “Refund and Cancellation Policy”.
-
The broker conducts unauthorised business in European territories.
-
The company has a poor reputation and is suspected of fraudulent activities.
-
Partnership terms are usually adverse.
-
The trading terminal is of poor technical quality.
-
There is a high risk involved regarding personal data and financial loss.
Legitimacy Check
To be clear, RevenueAR has no formal licensure by any known European regulator. A case in point is the absence of authorisation by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Moreover, while the client agreement refers to Luxembourg’s CSSF, the firm has no regulatory approval from this body. It is also not registered with any offshore regulator — something that should be kept in mind considering that such regulators have a tendency to issue licences to dubious organisations with little vetting.
A check on the official address given by the firm is another point of suspicion. On Google Maps, it is clear that there is no actual presence at the provided location in Luxembourg. The firm appears to be operating without actual offices and employees, apart from marketing personnel.
Another cause for concern is the company’s business history. No date of establishment appears on the main page of the website. But a WHOIS domain search confirms the site was registered only in mid 2024. This is likely responsible for the large number of negative reviews and the company’s brand being unknown in the world of financial trading.
Revenuear.com Content Quality
The dealer’s website is English-only and has a plain one-page design. This landing-page approach is popular with scam brokers as it keeps development costs low and enables quick copying to deceive potential traders.
The general quality of the revenuear.com website is low, with delayed loading. The only impressive element is an integrated securities quote feed. However, given the suspicious business reputation, such functionality does not make any sense. What’s more, this tool is just an integration of the TradingView widget.
No obligatory features like an FAQ section, live support, or downloadable trading software exist. No indication of a social network presence or messenger-based messaging is available, and all client contact is restricted to e-mail alone.
Key Trading Features
RevenueAR offers multiple types of accounts: “Newbie”, “With Experience”, and “Professional”. These tiers differ in terms of minimum deposit amounts and premium service access. We prefer to explore both the basic trading terms and the limitations that traders can encounter.
The minimum deposit is set at $500 — a sum designed to help project owners raise money in advance. Scandalously, the account may be restricted after the deposit. This is said to be a continuing practice even with high-end accounts, where customers might deposit as much as $50,000.
Leverage is between 1:20 and 1:50, depending on the asset. While these are technically within European regulation limits, in practice, leverage could be artificially capped to quickly empty clients’ accounts. There is no spread and commission information. RevenueAR can charge fees for dealing as laid out in the client agreement. The secrecy creates a large window for manipulation.
Access to more sophisticated features — e.g., deposit insurance, cover, and advisory consultancy — is limited to accounts of a minimum size of $25,000. Cryptocurrency trades are also only available to premium customers. This means that users of regular $500 deposits can’t even reach customer service.
Finally, customers are left with inferior treatment. There’s no learning material, no referral programme, and no organisation-based assistance except by subscribing to a premium membership.
RevenueAR Custom Utilities Insight
Trading is done via a web-based version of TradingView. It works, but with some drawbacks. Most important among them are delayed orders and increased commission fees. Support is provided solely via the browser version, not mobile or desktop applications.
Software access is via the client dashboard, which includes charts, trading history, and an order panel. There is no reference to remote-control software, but this doesn’t do much to offset the platform’s basic issue — lack of liquidity.
Customer Service Overview
All customer support from RevenueAR is conducted via e-mail, but only on weekdays. Basic account holders (with a minimum of $500) are not entitled to any support. English is the only supported language. Email validation tests also identify significant risks, including the risk of personal information being leaked and subsequently used to target third-party marketing.
Our Verdict
We strongly advise against any cooperation with RevenueAR. Market structure is profitably unorganised, nothing is revealed about commissions or spreads. The software is elementary and even devoid of basic functionality, while liquidity is de facto non-existent. The company holds practically zero credibility, and overwhelming negative reviews remain available.







I worked here for a few months and decided to leave RevenueAR. The administration deliberately demands larger deposits, namely, if you put only $500 as a deposit, don’t hope for any customer support! Result: $10,000 lost and ongoing quarrels with company managers!!