Finnso Review: What Traders Need to Know

However, in practice, conditions of cooperation appear to diverge markedly from such assurances. The so-called educational resources turn out to be nothing more than a rudimentary Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section. Regulation is handled by a low-tier authority with little credibility or standing in the financial community. Trading conditions are unfavourable, certain transactional parameters remain undisclosed, and reliance on CFDs in Finnso’s operations is inherently loss-making. We decided to examine whether such a profile could justifiably be labelled a scam.

Finnso Snapshot

Legitimacy Check

Finnso claims regulation from Greece’s HCMC (Hellenic Capital Market Commission). However, such regulation comes with caveats: the authority is widely regarded as having a low trust rating, meaning that even a formal licence offers no real guarantee of safe or fair trading conditions.

We wonder why Finnso’s corporate transparency is so poor. The listed office address is demonstrably fake, as confirmed through a simple Google Maps search. The firm appears to lack any genuine physical presence, alongside an absence of information on leadership or staffing. This level of secrecy raises serious concerns.

A further red flag emerges when we look at the Finnso’s history. WHOIS data reveals that the domain was only registered in 2023 and last updated in 2025. This recency explains the scarcity of genuine customer feedback and the firm’s minimal recognition in the market.

Finnso.com Content Quality

The broker’s official website is available in several language versions. Both the homepage and auxiliary sections are used primarily for aggressive promotion of services. There are no active links to download trading software, no useful plugins containing practical information, and no form to contact support via live chat. Collectively, these omissions make the site cumbersome and inconvenient to use.

We decided to explore these shortcomings further. The most significant weakness lies in the quality and accuracy of information. Details about additional services and “exclusive” benefits are frequently overstated or entirely inconsistent with reality — part of a marketing drive aimed at attracting rapid investment inflows. Questions also arise regarding the platform’s privacy and data security standards, leading us to conclude that registering on the site or attempting to deposit funds is unsafe. The only arguably positive feature is the presence of a link to the company’s Anti-Money Laundering (AML) policy.

The account registration interface is located in the top-right corner of the homepage. Opening an account requires providing a first name, surname, email address, telephone number, and password. The registration menu includes links to digital documents such as the Client Agreement and Privacy Policy, alongside a risk warning about trading Contracts for Difference.

Key Trading Features

Finnso offers clients three account types: Silver, Gold, and Platinum, with the main differences being discounts on spreads and swaps. The “Account Tiers” section lists only surface-level partnership conditions, which we consider an additional drawback.

The range of instruments includes currency pairs, indices, commodities, stocks, cryptocurrencies, and ETFs. However, every single instrument is traded exclusively as a CFD, which inherently carries high risk. Indeed, the company itself warns that losses in such instruments can reach 89% — a rare moment of candour.

The minimum deposit is €250, though this information is not easily found; one must navigate to the FAQ section to locate it. We wonder why such a crucial condition is hidden from plain sight. This deposit threshold is, in our view, a red flag: in many similar cases, once the minimum amount is deposited, accounts are swiftly blocked and customer support becomes unresponsive.

Leverage for retail clients is capped at 1:30, in line with certain regulatory requirements. Professional traders, however, are offered leverage of up to 1:200 — a level that we regard as a warning sign, hinting at risky practices and insufficient safeguarding measures.

As is common among questionable brokers, Finnso does not disclose details of its trading commissions, spreads, or swap rates. Discounted spreads of between 25% and 50% are promised only to holders of premium-tier accounts.

Additional services are minimal: so-called “expert support” and the same basic FAQ section that substitutes for educational content. Beyond this, there are no meaningful privileges for clients.

Finnso Custom Utilities Insight

When working with this broker, clients are restricted to a rudimentary piece of trading software — WebTrader. The reliance on a browser-based terminal is part of the company’s operational policy, yet it inevitably brings practical drawbacks. For instance, the platform is marked by low liquidity, resulting in noticeable delays in order execution.

Functionality is also limited, depriving users of access to advanced charting tools, technical indicators, and in-depth analytical resources that professional traders would normally expect. We wonder why Finnso, seeking investor trust, would opt for such a stripped-down setup in the first place.

Customer Service Overview

Finnso’s customer support is offered via email and telephone. Our verification through an email validator confirms that the listed email address is genuine. Nevertheless, the firm’s communication infrastructure leaves much to be desired.

There is no mention of official pages on social media or any presence on instant messaging platforms, depriving clients of modern, responsive support channels. This lack of visibility and engagement in the wider trading community further undermines the broker’s credibility. We decide it is fair to note that, without these channels, brand recognition remains virtually non-existent — a troubling sign for any company claiming to operate on an international scale.

Our Verdict

We recommend avoiding Finnso. The firm operates under questionable Greek regulation, lacks verifiable legal registration, and is plagued by a poor market reputation. Trading conditions are opaque and unfavourable, with no transparency on spreads or commissions.

About the author

Josh Middleton

Technical specialist

Josh Middleton is a technology enthusiast and software developer with a deep interest in financial markets. Josh has worked on developing trading platforms and algorithms for various brokers and fintech companies. His articles and reviews highlight brokers that offer innovative and user-friendly trading software, helping traders find the best technological solutions.