Fimatron Review: What Traders Need to Know

1.5 rating
1.5
2

In practice, the terms of cooperation with the company appear quite different — and often disadvantageous. We decided to examine the broker’s profile carefully, because concerns arise immediately. Firstly, the question of licensing remains unresolved: apart from superficial claims, there is nothing verifiable. Doubts also extend to customer service, as the published support email is inactive. The terms of the partnership remain opaque, since the administration prefers not to disclose details regarding leverage, spreads, or commissions. Reviews from clients are scarce, while brand recognition is practically negligible. The question then arises: can Fimatron really be classified as a fraudulent project?

Author: Josh Middleton. Edited and fact checked by: Alex Banks
About Our Team

Fimatron Snapshot

Claimed Regulation Not Found
Verified Regulation Not Found
Licence Last Checked 30/09/2025
Minimum Deposit €10,000
Retail Leverage up To Undisclosed
Affiliate Programme No Details
Type of Education Webinars, eBooks, FAQ
Claimed Year Foundation Undisclosed
Domain Parked Since 07/05/2025
Trading Software WebTrader
Mobile Compatibility Browser Trading
Languages Supported En, Es, Pt

Advantages and Disadvantages

  • The broker has added a section with frequently asked questions and reference information.
  • The project operates without a regulatory licence and conducts unauthorised business.
  • The platform lacks genuine legal registration.
  • The published address of its head office is fabricated.
  • The company carries a poor reputation with minimal recognition.
  • The Fimatron website features a template-style interface filled with redundant information.

Legitimacy Check

Verifying the legitimacy of Fimatron is an essential step before entering into any form of partnership or depositing funds. One must account for all potential risks, since scam projects are often designed to attract rapid investments from inexperienced traders. We decided to delve deeper into this matter. Our review will address regulation, the stated office address, and questions of legal registration. We will also consider the risks associated with deposits and the difficulty of recovering funds, even with the assistance of lawyers. Finally, we will examine how long the company has actually been active on the market, using WHOIS checks as a reference.

The first red flag concerns regulatory status. On its website, Fimatron includes a section on compliance, but rather than offering genuine data or links to registers, it merely lists generic phrases about reliability and safety. The broker holds no licence from any respected authority such as the FCA, nor from offshore regulators. This omission is intentional: the administration deliberately avoids the topic in order to mislead clients. Cooperation with an unlicensed broker almost always ends badly.

The firm does not maintain any genuine offices in London.

Another point relates to the claimed office location. Fimatron lists London as the site of its head office. However, even a simple check through Google Maps contradicts this claim. In reality, the company maintains no physical presence or representative branches anywhere. Such tactics are common among fraudulent firms, which routinely misinform clients about their location.

Verification of Fimatron’s details via OpenCorporates corroborates our concerns.

A further red flag is the lack of legal registration. The website provides no verifiable details, raising understandable concerns. An additional check through OpenCorporates confirms the worst: the broker does not appear in any corporate register.

Important: Given these observations, any suggestion of a safe partnership with Fimatron seems illusory. The chance of retrieving deposited funds is extremely low, even when involving legal specialists or law enforcement.

The fimatron.com domain check confirms that the company has only been operating since 2025.

Another crucial factor concerns the firm’s time on the market. Licensed brokers usually disclose such information openly. Fimatron does not. Instead, it lists vague details about non-existent privileges. In reality, WHOIS checks show the company has only been active since 2025. Adding to the concern, brand recognition is negligible, and authentic client reviews are extremely limited.

Fimatron.com Content Quality

The official website of the broker serves primarily as a repository of redundant information and marketing slogans. The portal is divided into several sections, though each appears overloaded with shallow content that provides no practical benefit to novice traders or investors. We decided to examine the site in detail, paying particular attention to its weaknesses — especially those most relevant to anyone considering a partnership with this intermediary. We will review the registration function, the structure of the personal account, and also the availability of digital documentation that should, in theory, be accessible on the broker’s site.

The first and most significant red flag is the lack of genuine, useful information. Instead of publishing precise figures or transparent conditions of cooperation, the fimatron.com website relies heavily on vague statements padded with superfluous wording and aggressive advertising. This applies across all sections — from the blog to the so-called trading information pages.

Another issue concerns technical optimisation. Pages load far more slowly than expected, while on mobile devices, the site frequently malfunctions. This means there is effectively no possibility of trading via smartphones or tablets. We also note persistent privacy concerns: the risk of personal data leaks remains high, particularly during registration, verification, or when funding accounts and entering payment details. In this respect, potential clients expose themselves to considerable danger.

The registration process has been deliberately simplified, designed solely to capture as many users as possible over both the short and long term. The “Open Account” button is prominently displayed in the upper-right corner of the homepage. Account creation takes place via a third-party domain, where users are asked to submit the following: name, surname, email, country of residence, phone number, account currency, password and referral code. While the presence of links to the client agreement and similar documents may seem positive, no explanation of the referral system itself is offered. More troublingly, completing the registration process is not as straightforward as advertised.

To access the Fimatron personal dashboard, a referral code must be entered — and such codes are provided exclusively by support staff. This unusual model indicates the company’s preference for aggressive client acquisition and service imposition. In reality, the functionality of the dashboard is minimal, restricted to password changes, editing personal details, passing verification, account opening, and basic browser-based trading.

The official site does include links to documents such as a privacy policy and files outlining AML and KYC requirements. However, the quality of these materials is questionable, their content vague and generic. We wonder whether the broker genuinely adheres to these provisions in practice, particularly in relation to anti-money laundering measures.

Key Trading Features

The essential trading conditions at Fimatron are intentionally obscured. The company focuses attention on its accounts, which differ by deposit amount and supposed additional services. Four tiers are available: Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum. We decided to investigate further, namely, on examining available instruments, minimum deposits, leverage, spreads, commissions, and the much-promoted “extras”.

Accounts at Fimatron differ in terms of the minimum deposit required and the range of additional services offered.

The basic list of instruments includes cryptocurrencies, currency pairs, and equities, with passing mention of contracts for difference (CFDs). However, the number of assets is not disclosed, nor is there any clarity on whether access differs between account types. We remind readers that CFD trading is highly risky, with some studies suggesting losses in up to 82% of cases.

The minimum deposit is set at €10,000. With higher deposits, more services and privileges allegedly become available. Astonishingly, full access requires a deposit of close to €1 million. For an unlicensed and unregistered company, such demands raise obvious concerns and are entirely unacceptable.

Equally problematic is the matter of leverage. Neither the account descriptions nor the FAQ section provide details. This deliberate silence leaves the administration free to manipulate leverage, draining client balances over time. The opacity does not end there: no useful information is provided on spreads, commissions, or related parameters — a formula that almost always leads to client losses.

Instead, Fimatron places a heavy emphasis on promoting so-called additional services. These include access to e-books, webinars, social trading, personal assistants, and risk-free trades. Meanwhile, on closer inspection, such offerings exist only in marketing claims. In practice, clients are left empty-handed, suffering only financial losses.

Fimatron Custom Utilities Insight

Partnership with Fimatron provides only one platform, WebTrader, operated entirely through a browser. There is no desktop application, nor proper mobile support. The deficiencies are obvious: low liquidity, the absence of professional tools and oscillators, and persistent instability of the terminal itself.

Customer Service Overview

Customer service is supposedly available via phone and email. In practice, phone numbers appear authentic, but the published email address is invalid — easily confirmed with a simple validator. Given these flaws, one cannot expect reliable support. Moreover, the company does not maintain any social media presence, nor does it engage with clients via messaging apps. The lack of communication channels further reinforces the impression that the broker is unwilling to maintain real contact with its clients.

It is not possible to contact Fimatron’s support team via email.

Our Verdict

We strongly advise against depositing funds with Fimatron. The project lacks both regulation and genuine legal registration. Reviews are few in number and overwhelmingly negative. The quality of the website and the functionality of its trading terminal inspire no confidence.

About the author

Josh Middleton
Josh Middleton
Technical specialist
Josh Middleton is a technology enthusiast and software developer with a deep interest in financial markets. Josh has worked on developing trading platforms and algorithms for various brokers and fintech companies. His articles and reviews highlight brokers that offer innovative and user-friendly trading software, helping traders find the best technological solutions.

2 Fimatron Reviews

  1. Tania Leigh

    A very dubious and suspicious broker. Fimatron offers no proper customer support. I couldn’t get through to the numbers listed, and sending emails in 2025 is just ridiculous! And just look at the website – a template design with no real option to register. Something strange and unsafe.

    2.0 rating
    2/5
  2. Karin Hubbard

    Thanks for the feedback about fimatron com! I almost got caught too, but I had doubts so I checked everything. And most importantly, company employees were constantly rushing me. If I had funded my money, I would definitely say goodbye to it! No no no…

    1.0 rating
    1/5

Leave a Review Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top